助手本体:会话引擎、LLM 路由、记忆、身份、语音适配

从 Obsidian 笔记库剥离为独立仓库。规划文档与 P0 报告留在笔记库,
代码(助手本体、TTS 服务、P0 基准脚本、ESP32 固件)在此。

架构:服务器是助手,本地是客户端
- 助手本体跑在 cadadmin-server,N5095 只做 USB 外设桥与网络桥接
- 起因:实测 N5095 无 AVX2,跑不动可用的语音模型

当前技术栈
- LLM:DeepSeek deepseek-flash(云端,必须关思考)
- TTS:Qwen3-TTS 1.7B(服务器 3090,独立 HTTP 服务)
- STT:Zipformer 中英双语 int8(CPU,中文识别率未测)

实测:端到端 16/16 通过,首音延迟 1545ms
(对比:本地 LLM + vits-zh-ll 是 179ms,但音色不满意——音质与延迟
在此硬件上此消彼长)

设计要点
- MemoryStore 接口按"可能远程"设计(全 async、可超时、可失败)
- user_id / session_id / track_id 三者分开,人脸只作候选不自动切身份
- 记忆查询强制带 owner_user_id,无按 id 单独取的口子
- 自动抽取的记忆是"候选",默认不参与检索
- 异步写记忆绑定创建时的身份,不读"当前用户"
- 引擎与传输解耦,只用文件音频即可端到端测试

模型与音频产物不进版本管理(1.1GB),由 download_models.sh 恢复
This commit is contained in:
ylhan
2026-09-15 11:05:09 +08:00
commit 35e107c290
46 changed files with 5976 additions and 0 deletions
+229
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,229 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""LLM 抽象层测试。
重点验证实测踩过的三个坑是否真的被吸收:
1. 思考字段名差异(reasoning / reasoning_content)
2. 关闭思考的方式差异
3. 多条 system 消息归一化
运行:
~/venvs/ai_assistant/bin/python -m app.tests.test_llm
或
cd <项目根> && ~/venvs/ai_assistant/bin/python app/tests/test_llm.py
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import asyncio
import sys
from pathlib import Path
sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent.parent))
from app.config import AppConfig # noqa: E402
from app.llm import ( # noqa: E402
ChunkKind, DeepSeekProvider, FallbackProvider, LocalVLLMProvider, create_provider,
)
from app.llm.base import LLMProvider # noqa: E402
OK, FAIL = [], []
def check(name: str, cond: bool, detail: str = "") -> None:
(OK if cond else FAIL).append(name)
print(f" [{'PASS' if cond else 'FAIL'}] {name}" + (f" — {detail}" if detail else ""))
# ---------------------------------------------------------------- 纯本地逻辑(无需网络)
def test_normalize_messages() -> None:
print("\n=== 1. 消息归一化(多条 system → 一条,置于开头)===")
msgs = [
{"role": "system", "content": "你是助手。"},
{"role": "user", "content": "你好"},
{"role": "system", "content": "记忆:用户叫 ylhan。"},
]
out = LLMProvider.normalize_messages(msgs)
check("只剩一条 system", sum(1 for m in out if m["role"] == "system") == 1,
f"实际 {sum(1 for m in out if m['role']=='system')} 条")
check("system 在开头", out[0]["role"] == "system")
check("两条 system 内容都保留",
"你是助手。" in out[0]["content"] and "ylhan" in out[0]["content"])
check("非 system 消息顺序不变",
[m["role"] for m in out[1:]] == ["user"])
# 无 system 的情况不应凭空造一条
out2 = LLMProvider.normalize_messages([{"role": "user", "content": "hi"}])
check("无 system 时不新增", len(out2) == 1 and out2[0]["role"] == "user")
# 空 system 应被丢弃
out3 = LLMProvider.normalize_messages(
[{"role": "system", "content": " "}, {"role": "user", "content": "hi"}])
check("空白 system 被丢弃", len(out3) == 1)
def test_request_bodies() -> None:
print("\n=== 2. 各后端的请求体(关思考方式不同)===")
cfg_local = AppConfig.load().llm
cfg_ds = AppConfig.load().llm_fallback
cfg_local.thinking = False
cfg_ds.thinking = False
b_local = LocalVLLMProvider(cfg_local)._build_body(
[{"role": "user", "content": "hi"}], tools=None, max_tokens=100)
check("本机用 chat_template_kwargs",
b_local.get("chat_template_kwargs") == {"enable_thinking": False},
str(b_local.get("chat_template_kwargs")))
b_ds = DeepSeekProvider(cfg_ds)._build_body(
[{"role": "user", "content": "hi"}], tools=None, max_tokens=100)
check("DeepSeek 用 thinking.type",
b_ds.get("thinking") == {"type": "disabled"},
str(b_ds.get("thinking")))
check("两者模型名不同", b_local["model"] != b_ds["model"],
f"{b_local['model']} vs {b_ds['model']}")
def test_sse_parsing() -> None:
print("\n=== 3. SSE 解析:两种思考字段名都认 ===")
class FakeResp:
def __init__(self, lines): self.content = self._gen(lines)
async def _gen(self, lines):
for l in lines:
yield (l + "\n").encode()
async def run(lines):
return [c async for c in LLMProvider._iter_sse(FakeResp(lines))]
async def main():
# reasoning_content(DeepSeek 写法)
c1 = await run([
'data: {"choices":[{"delta":{"reasoning_content":"想一想"}}]}',
'data: {"choices":[{"delta":{"content":"你好"}}]}',
'data: [DONE]',
])
check("认 reasoning_content",
any(c.kind == ChunkKind.REASONING and c.text == "想一想" for c in c1))
check("content 正常", any(c.kind == ChunkKind.CONTENT and c.text == "你好" for c in c1))
# reasoning(本机 vLLM 写法)
c2 = await run([
'data: {"choices":[{"delta":{"reasoning":"想一下"}}]}',
'data: {"choices":[{"delta":{"content":"在的"}}]}',
'data: [DONE]',
])
check("认 reasoning(本机 vLLM 字段)",
any(c.kind == ChunkKind.REASONING and c.text == "想一下" for c in c2))
# 工具调用分片累积
c3 = await run([
'data: {"choices":[{"delta":{"tool_calls":[{"index":0,"id":"c1","function":{"name":"set_light","arguments":"{\\"ro"}}]}}]}',
'data: {"choices":[{"delta":{"tool_calls":[{"index":0,"function":{"arguments":"om\\":\\"客厅\\"}"}}]}}]}',
'data: {"choices":[{"delta":{},"finish_reason":"tool_calls"}]}',
])
tc = [c for c in c3 if c.kind == ChunkKind.TOOL_CALL]
check("工具调用参数分片拼接", tc and tc[-1].tool_arguments == '{"room":"客厅"}',
tc[-1].tool_arguments if tc else "无")
check("工具名保留", tc and tc[-1].tool_name == "set_light")
# 坏帧不应崩溃
c4 = await run(['data: {坏json', 'data: {"choices":[{"delta":{"content":"ok"}}]}', 'data: [DONE]'])
check("坏帧被跳过而非崩溃",
any(c.kind == ChunkKind.CONTENT and c.text == "ok" for c in c4))
asyncio.run(main())
# ---------------------------------------------------------------- 需要网络
async def test_live() -> None:
cfg = AppConfig.load()
provider = create_provider(cfg.llm)
print(f"\n=== 4. 实连本机 vLLM({cfg.llm.model} @ {cfg.llm.base_url})===")
ok, detail = await provider.health()
check("健康检查", ok, detail)
if not ok:
await provider.aclose()
return
msgs = [
{"role": "system", "content":
"你是桌面陪伴助手,回复必须简短自然、适合朗读,不超过两句话,"
"不要用 Markdown 或表情符号。"},
{"role": "user", "content": "今天天气怎么样"},
{"role": "assistant", "content": "今天北京晴,十八到二十六度。"},
{"role": "user", "content": "那明天呢"},
]
res = await provider.complete(msgs, max_tokens=120)
print(f" 回答: {res.content.strip()[:70]!r}")
print(f" 首token(回答)={res.first_content_ms:.0f}ms 总={res.total_ms:.0f}ms")
print(f" 思考={len(res.reasoning)}字 完成tok={res.usage.get('completion_tokens') if res.usage else '?'}")
check("有回答内容", bool(res.content.strip()))
check("关思考后无思考内容", len(res.reasoning) == 0, f"{len(res.reasoning)} 字")
check("首token在 1 秒内", (res.first_content_ms or 9e9) < 1000,
f"{res.first_content_ms:.0f}ms")
check("回复足够短", len(res.content) < 100, f"{len(res.content)} 字")
# 工具调用
tools = [{"type": "function", "function": {
"name": "set_light", "description": "开关指定房间的灯",
"parameters": {"type": "object", "properties": {
"room": {"type": "string"}, "on": {"type": "boolean"}},
"required": ["room", "on"]}}}]
res2 = await provider.complete([{"role": "user", "content": "把客厅的灯打开"}],
tools=tools, max_tokens=128)
check("工具调用正确", res2.has_tool_calls and
res2.tool_calls[0].parsed_arguments().get("room") == "客厅",
f"{res2.tool_calls[0].name if res2.tool_calls else '无'}")
# 取消:模拟打断
async def cancel_midway():
async for _ch in provider.stream(
[{"role": "user", "content": "请详细讲一下中国历史"}], max_tokens=800):
return "cancelled"
return "finished"
got = await asyncio.wait_for(cancel_midway(), timeout=30)
check("可中途取消(打断)", got == "cancelled", got)
await provider.aclose()
async def test_fallback_logic() -> None:
print("\n=== 5. 降级逻辑(不发真实请求)===")
cfg = AppConfig.load()
class BoomProvider(LocalVLLMProvider):
def __init__(self, c, err): super().__init__(c); self._err = err
async def stream(self, *a, **kw):
raise self._err
yield # noqa: 使其成为生成器
fallback = DeepSeekProvider(cfg.llm_fallback)
# 连接类错误应降级
from app.llm.base import LLMError
p = FallbackProvider(BoomProvider(cfg.llm, ConnectionError("连不上")), fallback)
check("连接错误判为可降级", p._should_fallback(ConnectionError("x")))
check("超时判为可降级", p._should_fallback(TimeoutError("x")))
check("503 判为可降级", p._should_fallback(LLMError("local HTTP 503: busy")))
check("400 判为不可降级", not p._should_fallback(LLMError("local HTTP 400: bad")))
check("401 判为不可降级", not p._should_fallback(LLMError("local HTTP 401: auth")))
def main() -> int:
test_normalize_messages()
test_request_bodies()
test_sse_parsing()
asyncio.run(test_live())
asyncio.run(test_fallback_logic())
print("\n" + "=" * 62)
print(f"通过 {len(OK)} / {len(OK) + len(FAIL)}")
for n in FAIL:
print(f" 未通过: {n}")
return 0 if not FAIL else 1
if __name__ == "__main__":
sys.exit(main())